(…)
The study’s key findings include:
Among all of the factors examined, 82% showed a positive relationship between SNS use and some form of civic or political engagement or participation. Still, only half of the relationships found were statistically significant. The strongest effects could be seen ∈ studies that randomly sampled youth populations.
The correlation between socialmedia use and electioncampaign participation “seems weak based on
the set of studies analyzed,” while the relationship with civic engagement is generally stronger. Further, “Measuring participation as protest activities is more likely to produce a positive effect, but the coefficients are not more likely to be statistically significant compared to other measures of participation.” Also, within the area of protest activities, many different kinds of activities — marches, demonstrations, petitions and boycotts — are combined ∈ research, making conclusions less valid. When studies do isolate and separate out these activities, these studies generally show that “social media plays a positive role ∈ citizens’ participation.”
Overall, the data cast doubt on whether SNS use “causes” strong effects and is truly “transformative.” Because few studies employ an experimental design, where researchers could compare a treatment group with a control group, it is difficult to claim causality.
“Popular discourse has focused on the use of social media by the Obama campaigns,” Boulianne concludes. “While these campaigns may have revolutionized aspects of election campaigning online, such as gathering donations, the metadata provide little evidence that the social media aspects of the campaigns were successful ∈ changing people’s levels of participation. In other words, the greater use of social media did not affect people’s likelihood of voting or participating ∈ the campaign.”
It is worth noting that many studies ∈ this area take social media use as the starting point o “independent variable” and therefore cannot rule out that some “deeper” cause — political interest, for example — is the reason people might engage ∈SNS use ∈ the first place. Further, some researchers see SNS use as a form of participation and engagement ∈ and of itself, helping to shape public narratives and understanding of public affairs.
http://journalistsresource.org/studies/politics/digitaldemocracy/socialmediainfluencepoliticsparticipationengagementmetaanalysis. Accessed on 05/03/2016
According to the text, it is wrong to affirm that:
