Questão 80

During the nineteen-seventies and eighties, a researcher at the University of Washington started noticing something strange $\in$ the college's experimental forest. For years, a blight of caterpillars had been munching the trees to death. Then, suddenly, the caterpillars themselves started dying off. The forest was able to recover. But what had happened to the caterpillars? The researcher, David Rhoades, who had a background $\in$ chemistry and zoology, found that the trees $\in$ the forest had changed the chemistry of their leaves, to the detriment of the caterpillars. Even more surprising, trees that had been nibbled by caterpillars weren't the only ones that had changed their chemistry. Some were changing their leaves before caterpillars reached them, as if they'd received a warning. A shocking possibility presented itself: the trees were signalling to one another. Zoë Schlanger recounts Rhoades's story $\in$ her new book, "The Light Eaters: How the Unseen World of Plant Intelligence Offers a New Understanding of Life on Earth." The contemporary world of botany that Schlanger explores $\in$ "The Light Eaters" is still divided over the matter of how plants sense the world and whether they can be said to communicate. But, $\in$ the past twenty years, the idea that plants communicate has gained broader acceptance. Research $\in$ recent decades has shown garden-variety lima beans protecting themselves by synthesizing and releasing chemicals to summon the predators of the insects that eat them; lab-grown pea shoots navigating mazes and responding to the sound of running water; and a chameleonic vine $\in$ the jungles of Chile mimicking the shape and color of nearby plants by a mechanism that's not yet understood. Schlanger acknowledges that some of the research yields as many questions as answers. It's not clear how the vine gathers information about surrounding plants to perform its mimicry. New Yorker. 12 June 2024. Adaptado.